The state of the Church

Revelation chapters 2-3. Jesus’ assessment of how well each of the churches is following him. Latent is also an outline of Church history up to the present day.

One approach to understanding the messages to the seven churches is to see each church as encapsulating a particular age in Church history. The first to make this proposal was Watchman Nee, in his book The Orthodoxy of the Church, in 1945. He argued that the community at Ephesus represented the earliest Church, Smyrna the Church up to the time of Constantine, Pergamon the Church up to the 7th century, Thyatira the Roman Catholic Church, Sardis the Protestant Church, Philadelphia the Brethren Church in the 18th and 19th centuries and Laodicea what the Brethren degenerated into. Unfortunately, the scheme is marred by bogus etymological interpretations of the place names and disquisitions going far beyond what the text can justify. The general approach, however, is accepted.

The messages also have a contemporary relevance, whatever period one is living in. The main purpose is to remind the Church that Christ is very zealous for the spiritual health of the one he will marry, and he knows her inside out, better than we know ourselves. Though it might seem odd to adopt such a modern term, the messages are essentially performances appraisals. If we take to heart what the Lord says to the congregations, we will not be put to shame.

“To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: ‘The words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks in the midst of the seven golden lampstands.
“ ‘I know your works, and your toil, and your endurance, and how you cannot bear those who are evil, but have tested those who call themselves apostles and are not and have found them to be false. I know your endurance, and how you have suffered for my name’s sake, and have not grown weary. But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you first had. Remember therefore from whence you have fallen and repent, and do the first works. If not, I will come to you quickly and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent. But this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who conquers I will grant to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.’ ”

By etymology, aggelos, ‘angel’, means ‘messenger’, just as aggelia means ‘message’ and euaggelion, the ‘good message’ or ‘gospel’. Apparently the churches are each assigned an angel, and it is the angel that Jesus addresses, ‘you’ in the Greek being singular. But in practice it is impossible to read the appraisals in this way. Alternatively, ‘of the assembly’ (church) could be a genitive of apposition – ‘the angel that is the assembly in Ephesus’ and so on – much as ‘the temple of his body’ means ‘the temple that is his body’ (John 2:22); but this too seems a little strained. However we resolve the difficulty, the sense is that each church has a common life; it is not a group of mere individuals. The Lord addresses the church as a body, then closes with an exhortation to each member. Each is to listen to what the Spirit says to all the churches – not just his own – and understand its relevance to his own spiritual life.

Jesus walks among the lampstands as he once did among the trees in the garden of Eden. Nothing is hidden from him. The Ephesians are commended for their discernment, their perseverance, and their faithfulness – all important qualities. In his farewell speech Paul warned that fierce wolves would come and seek to distort his teaching (Acts 20:29f). It seems they took the warning to heart and saw through these ‘false apostles’.

Nonetheless, the church is in decline, for they do not love him as they once did. ‘Love’ here is agape. Whether or not it has an emotional element, it is primarily evinced in ‘works’ (or deeds). ‘If anyone has the world’s wherewithal and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God’s love abide in him? Children, let us not love in word, with the tongue, but in deed and in truth’ (I John 3:18). Jesus counsels them to remember the love that they had when Paul founded the community. They were once excited, grateful, full of zeal; now the new life seems stale. That John’s own church should be criticised in this respect is sobering, for he had repeatedly stressed the primacy of the commandment to love God. Did this teaching itself now seem stale? Without agape (praying, meditating on the word, looking out for the lonely, sharing one another’s burdens – the expression of agape needs to be spelled out) a church is no better than a noisy gong (I Cor 13:1), and if it does not glorify him, Jesus will bring it to an end.

Although we know almost nothing about the Nicolaitans, the name means a follower of Nicolaos (one tradition identifies him as the Nicolas of Acts 6:5). From the message to the church at Pergamom we learn that the group considered it permissible to eat food sacrificed to idols and to fornicate with cult prostitutes.

The verb ‘conquer’ expects an object, but none is given (not until 12:11). Each must listen to the Spirit to find out what his particular enemy is. In one form or another it will be the flesh, the opinion of others, and the Devil. Whoever conquers these will be granted the right to eat of the fruit that was denied to the first human couple. He will enjoy life with God forever.

“And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: ‘The words of the first and the last, who became dead and lived.
“ ‘I know your works and your tribulation and your poverty – but you are rich – and the slander of those who say that they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not fear what you are going to suffer. Behold, the devil is going to throw some of you into prison, so that you may be tested, and for ten days you will have tribulation. Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the wreath of life.
‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers will not be hurt by the second death.’ ”

The city’s name, Smurne or Smurna, derives from smurna, meaning myrrh, which was its main export. Among other uses, myrrh was used for embalming (John 19:39). The magi’s gift of myrrh some time after Christ’s birth presaged his martyrdom.

Jesus says nothing against the community here. It is doing good work, despite the tribulation (which John too was experiencing), and its material poverty, and the opposition from Jews in the city. For a little while the persecution is going to intensify. Some will be thrown into prison. Some may die. But if they remain faithful and do not deny their Master, they will come out the other side with the prize of eternal life (a wreath such as was awarded to victors at the games, II Tim 2:5, 4:8). They will not suffer the ‘second death’ that awaits people who have no faith and whose works are found wanting (Rev 20:11ff).

About sixty years later several of Smyrna’s Christians were martyred, famously its 86-year-old bishop Polycarp. He had been a disciple of John’s and, as a bishop, a vigorous opponent of the philosopher Marcion, who maintained that the God of the Old Testament was an altogether different deity from the loving God represented by Jesus– a view that is again popular. In AD 155, in the space of a few days, more than ten Christians were executed for refusing to call Caesar ‘Lord’ (not that different an issue from being forced to confess England’s King or Rome’s Pope as head of the Church). Polycarp was the last. The account of his martyrdom indicates that Jews were among the crowd demanding blood.

The oldest reference to the book of Revelation comes from one of Polycarp’s disciples, Irenaeus, who wrote in Against Heresies that the vision was received ‘almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign’. Irenaeus having been taught by Polycarp, and Polycarp by John, the statement is well attested.

“And to the angel of the church in Pergamon write: ‘The words of him who has the sharp two-edged sword.
“ ‘I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is. And you hold fast my name, and did not deny my faith even in the days of Antipas my faithful witness, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells. But I have a few things against you: you have there some who hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, that they might eat food sacrificed to idols and fornicate. Thus you too have some who hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans. Repent therefore. If not, I will come to you quickly and war against them with the sword of my mouth.
‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white pebble, with a new name written on the pebble that no one knows except the one who receives it.’ ”

‘Satan’s throne’ must be the Altar of Zeus, now in Berlin. Zeus was the head of the Greek pantheon and the chief god of Pergamon, and members of the community were expected to offer him sacrifice. While we can now admire the architecture and the sculpture, in John’s time the altar was where citizens unknowingly worshipped Satan. Christians have resisted the pressure. However, some have been persuaded that participation in the rites of pagan worship is not incompatible with their faith.

Balak was king of Moab at the time that the Israelites were preparing to cross the Jordan. He asked Balaam, a well-known mystic, to curse Israel, but the angel of Yahweh stood in his way, brandishing a sword, and Balaam found he could only bless them. Later, he advised Balak he could weaken Israel another way, by inviting them to participate in sacrifices to Baal and fornicate with Moabite women (Num 25:1-5, 31:16). Those who did so provoked God’s anger and God had them put to death. Jesus indicates that he looks on such practices in the same light. Faced with the question of whether Gentile believers had to follow the law of Moses, the apostles decided that they did not; only, they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood products, from animals that had been strangled, and from fornication (Acts 15:29). People in the church are now doing just what the apostles instructed them not to do. Peter warned that the Church would be attacked in this way (II Pet 2) and now the prophecy is coming to pass. Unless the offenders repent, Jesus will ‘war’ with them with his sword. Similar language near the end of the book (19:11-15) indicates that they will be struck down physically, not merely admonished.

He who conquers is promised participation in a mystery greater than that of the cult: not food offered to idols but the gift of the bread of life, and a token specific to him, admission into the priesthood of the one true God.

The Church has always had to battle the temptation to adulterate ‘the faith once delivered to the saints’ (Jude 3), in the hope of winning acceptance and disarming opposition. Antipas is otherwise unattested, but evidently he died upholding the faith. From Emperor Constantine onwards the temptation took on a different guise. Persecution came to an end and the Church began to occupy a privileged position in society. This was a good thing in the main. Gladiatorial games and crucifixion were abolished, Sunday became a day of rest, polytheistic worship was discouraged. Then in 380 the State adopted Christianity as the official religion. A State religion there had to be; it would be anachronistic to suppose that institutional polytheism could have withered and Christianity remained a network of local churches. So a professional class of priests was set apart to stand between the laity and God, and the Bishop of Rome replaced the Emperor as the Empire’s Chief Priest, the Pontifex Maximus. Peter’s teaching (I Pet 2:9) that all believers were priests, serving God and making him known, was given up.

In the State’s eyes, the main function of religion was to maintain the pax deorum, the goodwill of heaven that ensured peace. Thus understood, Christianity proved of no avail. In 410 Rome was sacked by the Visigoths and again in 455 by the Vandals. The western part of the Roman Empire disintegrated. The Church, on the other hand, survived. Although the Visigoths and the Vandals tore up the Empire’s borders, they already confessed the Christian faith, and in that respect there was no change. In due course it would be the Church that gave rulers their legitimacy. The eastern part of the Empire remained intact.

“And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write: ‘The words of the Son of God, whose eyes are like a flame of fire, and his feet like burnished bronze.
“ ‘I know your works, and your love and faith and ministry and endurance, and that your last works exceed your first. But I have this against you, that you tolerate the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she is teaching and deceiving my servants to fornicate and eat food sacrificed to idols. I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her fornication. Behold, I will cast her onto a bed and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, and I will kill her children with pestilence. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches the inner parts, and I will give to each of you according to your works. To you I say, and to the others in Thyatira, who do not have this teaching, those who have not known what some call the ‘deep’ things of Satan, I do not cast on you any other burden. Only hold fast what you have until I come.
‘The one who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations, and he will shepherd them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father. And I will give him the star of the morning. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’ ”

‘Inward parts’ translates nephrous kai kardias, literally ‘kidneys and hearts,’ reflecting the belief that these were at the core of a person’s moral being (nous is the word for ‘mind’). “I, Yahweh, search the heart and test the kidneys, to give to every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds” (Jer 17:10). As with every message, Jesus mentions works first among the things he knows about the church, for they are the fruit by which he judges. In this respect the church is improving, and overall the message is positive. He does not question its love, its faith, or its steadfastness. The only criticism concerns the same issue that the church at Pergamon faced: the pull of the flesh.

Jezebel was a daughter of Ethbaal, king of Sidon (I Ki 16:32) and exemplified what happened when Israelite men married foreign women. Jezebel married Ahab, king of Israel. A sorceress and fornicatrix (II Ki 9:22), she induced him to build a house for Baal, the supreme god of the Canaanites, and to place in it a wooden pillar, symbolising the tree of life, where Asherah, Baal’s consort, was to be worshipped. Four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and four hundred prophets of Asherah ate at the royal table. The cult was demonic (hence the ability to prophesy), and entailed an understanding of God as a sexual being and corresponding practices (idol worship, fornication with cult prostitutes, child sacrifice) that were an abomination. The cult was so popular that only seven thousand of Ahab’s subjects did not bow the knee to Baal. Thus Ahab did more to provoke God’s anger than all the kings before him. Yet in the end he repented, and God accepted his repentance. Jezebel did not.

Old Testament history is repeating itself. Calling herself a prophetess, the new Jezebel is claiming to be a conduit for words and insights coming direct from God. The church has failed to rebuke her, so Jesus warns that he will take action himself. On past occasions, behaviour offensive to the Holy Spirit provoked disease, blindness, or even death (Acts 5:1-10, 13:8-11, I Cor 11:30). Retribution will be so clear that ‘all the churches’ will hear of it. While judgement is no longer swift, no one should think that there will not be a final reckoning.

He is coming soon, and when he does, he will repay each person according to what he has done (Matt 16:27 Rev 22:12). ‘Each one’s work will become manifest’ (I Cor 3:13). This is a vital part of Christian doctrine. Having wiped the slate clean, he expects us to be zealous for good works (Titus 2:14). He even treats good works as if they created a debt on his part. ‘So we aspire, whether we are at home or away from home, to please him. For we must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ, that each may receive his due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil’ (II Cor 5:10). Church leaders especially are reminded to live up to their calling (Luke 12:42-48).

The closing exhortation reiterates that the life to come is not on a cloud in heaven but among the nations on earth. One example of reward is that we will exercise responsibility on earth. We will share in his reign.
He proceeded to tell a parable, because he was near Jerusalem, and because they supposed that the kingdom of God was to appear immediately. He said therefore, “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return. Calling ten of his servants, he gave them ten minas, and said to them, ‘Engage in business until I come.’ But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us.’ So when he came back, having received the kingdom, he ordered these servants to whom he had given the money to be called to him, that he might know what they had gained by doing business. The first came before him, saying, ‘Lord, your mina has produced ten minas more.’ And he said to him, ‘Well done, good servant! Because you have been faithful in a very little, you shall have authority over ten cities.’ And the second came, saying, ‘Lord, your mina has made five minas.’ And he said to him, ‘And you are to be over five cities.’ And another came, saying, ‘Lord, here is your mina, which I kept laid away in a handkerchief; for I was afraid of you, because you are a severe man. You take what you did not deposit, and reap what you did not sow.’ He said to him, ‘I will condemn you with your own words, you wicked servant! You knew that I was a severe man, taking what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow? Why then did you not put my money in the bank, and at my coming I might have collected it with interest?’ And he said to those who stood by, ‘Take the mina from him, and give it to the one who has the ten minas.’ And they said to him, ‘Lord, he has ten minas!’ ‘For I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. As for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me.’ ” (Luke 19:11-27)
A lot is communicated in this parable. Jesus likens his future absence to a long journey; he is not coming back ‘soon’ in the usual sense; and during this absence his slaves (douloi, translated ‘servants’ throughout by concession) are to look after his affairs on his behalf, to ‘keep his works’. Those who are citizens (representing the Jews) do not even accept his authority. When he returns, the master asks his slaves what they have done with the resources entrusted to him, and rewards them accordingly. To one he gives authority over ten cities, to another five. For he is about to rule the nations with a rod of iron (Ps 2:9), and there will still be work to do. Perhaps most startling for a modern reader is the confirmation that anyone who thinks that the master does not mean what he says will be dealt with severely, just like the nations themselves will be. A believer is expected to serve his lord.

The ‘star of the morning’ recalls Peter’s words that the Old Testament prophets are like a lamp shining in a dingy place, until the day dawns and the true light-bringer (metaphorically, the planet Venus) rises in our hearts.

The exhortation to “hold fast what you have until I come” indicates that the church will continue until the end. In this context, fornication and adultery have a chiefly spiritual sense. If the churches at Thyatira and Pergamon seem very similar, the difference is that the Moabites tempted Israel from without, in order to weaken her; Jezebel tempted Israel from within. She used religion to strengthen the State’s spiritual and political power. In the course of the Middle Ages the Roman Church did much the same. One example was the machinations that led in 1309 to the Papacy’s transferring its seat to Avignon, France. It continued there until 1377, when Pope Gregory XI returned to Rome. The following year he died and the crisis only worsened. From then until 1417 until 1417 there were at least two claimants to the throne, one based in Rome, the other in Avignon. What with its venality and its false theology (partly challenged in the Reformation), the Church was in a dire state.

The threatened chastisement (thanatos, death, but here pestilence, as in 6:8) refers to the Black Death, the most catastrophic pandemic in human history. More than 75 million people died. Clergymen were hit worst because of their contact with the sick and dying. While one hesitates to attribute so indiscriminate a plague to the hand of God, its very scale cannot but raise the possibility. This was something more than the tower of Siloam.

Meanwhile the Byzantine Empire – the former Roman Empire to the east – was being eaten away by the might of Islam. Following the battle of Manzikert in 1071, most of Anatolia fell to the Seljuks. In the 13th century Mongolian emirates took control, followed in the 14th by the Ottomans. Muslims have ruled the peninsula ever since. Byzantium itself fell in 1453.

“And to the angel of the church in Sardis write: ‘The words of him who has the seven spirits of God and the seven stars.
“ ‘I know your works. You have a reputation for being alive, but you are dead. Be vigilant, and strengthen what remains and was about to die, for I have not found your works complete before my God. Remember, therefore, how you used to receive and to hear. Keep, and repent. If you will not be vigilant, I will come upon you like a thief, and the hour I come upon you will take you unawares. Yet you have a few names in Sardis who have not soiled their garments, and they will walk with me in white, for they are worthy.
‘The one who conquers will be clothed in white garments, and truly I will not blot his name from the book of life, and I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’ ”
The church is dead. Even the part of it that might not be dead is moribund. Once more, Christ’s emphasis is on works. As at Ephesus, the church at Sardis is counselled to look back to a time when it listened to his voice with eagerness. Now it is complacent. The reference to his unexpected return recalls the parable of the ten maidens (Matt 25:1-13).
“The kingdom of heaven will be like ten maidens who, having taken their lamps, went out to meet the bridegroom. Five of them were wise, and five foolish. The foolish, when they took their lamps, took with them no oil, but the wise took flasks of oil with their lamps. As the bridegroom was delayed, they all became drowsy and slept. But at midnight there was a cry, ‘Look, the bridegroom is coming, go out to meet him!’ Then all those maidens rose and trimmed their lamps. And the foolish said to the wise, ‘Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.’ But the wise answered, ‘There will not be enough for us and you; go rather to the dealers and buy for yourselves.’ And while they were going off to buy, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went in with him to the marriage feast, and the door was shut. Afterward the other maidens also came, saying, ‘Lord, Lord! Open to us.’ But he answered, ‘Truly, I say to you, I do not know you.’ Be vigilant, therefore, for you do not know the day, nor the hour.”
Two men will be in the field; one is taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one is taken and the other left. Once that has happened, it will be too late to repent.

That Jesus should call God “my God” is unsettling if one supposes that he was somehow coeternal with his father, but it is characteristic of the Messiah (Ps 18, Ps 89:26, Isa 49:4f). On the cross he cried, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” After the resurrection he told his disciples, “I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.” The psalm has him say, “I will tell of your name to my brothers; in the midst of the congregation I will sing your praise” (Heb 2:12). Ultimately we will all be children of the Father (Heb 2:11).

The emphasis on ‘white garments’ is an emphasis on holiness. Garments clothe our nakedness (Gen 3:21) because we all have a knowledge of good and evil, and those who are in the flesh cannot please God (Rom 8:8); ‘with my flesh I serve the law of sin’ (Rom 7:25). Garments cover our sin, are a provision of God (Gen 3:21) and, figuratively speaking, need to be kept clean. In the life to come we will be ‘further clothed’, not naked (II Cor 5:1-4). The ‘book [or scroll] of life’ contains the names of those appointed to eternal life (Acts 13:48, Rev 13:8), but the names can be erased (Ex 32:33, Ps 69:28, Heb 6:4-6, 2 Pet 2:20f) – as witness the parable about the ten maidens. Resurrection to eternal life is implicit in the sacrificial system that God instituted when he made for the first human couple clothes of skins (Gen 4:4).

It is not difficult to see the Protestant churches in the indictment of being only reputedly alive. The Reformation went only so far. Its works were ‘not complete’, and Luther, for one, struggled to understand how works might be inseparable from faith (he did not even recognise the books of James and Revelation). The rise of Puritanism in the 17th century itself reflected a perception that much remained unreformed. But it was a minority movement, and in the early 18th century it fizzled out. Jesus’ warning that he will come on them like a thief may or may not imply that the church will persist to the end of the age.

“And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write: ‘The words of the holy one, the true one, he who has the key of David, who opens and no one will shut, who shuts and no one opens.
“ ‘I know your works. Behold, I have set before you an open door, which no one can shut, because you have little power, and have kept my word, and have not denied my name. Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie – behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and know that I have loved you. Because you have kept my word of endurance, I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world to try the inhabitants of the earth. I am coming quickly. Hold fast what you have, so that no one may take your wreath.
‘The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from my God, and my own new name. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’ ”

The name Philadelphia means brotherly love. The opening words refer to when God told the self-serving steward of the house of David that he would replace him: Eliakim would take over the key of David and go in and out as he pleased (Isa 22:22). Jesus signifies that, in a much greater sense, he now has charge of the royal house, and will use his power to open doors. Some of the Jews – followers of Satan rather than real Jews (Rom 2:28f) – have been opposing their witness. Jesus promises that these opponents will abase themselves before them. As with the church at Smyrna, he has no word of criticism. This is the only church after the general greeting to hear that he has loved them (in the agape sense). Knowing what they have gone through, he will keep them from the tribulation described later in the book.

The ‘temple of my God’ is his invisible dwelling-place in heaven. Whoever remains faithful will be part of that habitation (Isa 56:5); he will know God intimately, and Jesus intimately. God and man together, the new Jerusalem, will come down from heaven to rule.

An open door suggests an opportunity to share the message about the kingdom with those who will listen (I Cor 16:9, II Cor 2:12, Col 4:3). Here again we may discern a historical parallel. In the 18th century George Whitfield, John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards travelled far and wide in Britain and North America to bring the gospel to many millions who had never heard it, despite attending church every week. Undeterred by violent mobs, they asked, “Do you desire to flee from the wrath to come, and to be saved from your sins?” Many repented, and heeded the call to aspire after holiness and goodness. Like the Jews in the city, clergy in the established Church opposed them; few welcomed the converts into their congregations. Later some changed their minds and saw the Evangelical Revival as a blessing from God.

In terms of ‘works’, the effect on society was enormous: dramatic falls in murder, gambling, prostitution and alcoholism, the founding of schools, hospitals and orphanages, reform of the prison system, the abolition of slavery. The revolution continued into the 19th and early 20th centuries as the gospel went out into Asia and South America. Huge efforts were made to translate the Bible into native languages. Perhaps the greatest pioneer was William Carey. Noting that ‘multitudes sit at ease and give themselves no concern about the far greater part of their fellow sinners, who to this day, are lost in ignorance and idolatry’, in 1792 he founded the Baptist Missionary Society and emigrated the following year to India. There he translated the New Testament into Bengali and other languages and helped to outlaw infanticide and the immolation of widows. Other missionary societies sprang up. Men and women of extraordinary faith but little power took the gospel to far-flung lands, at great personal cost. Carey himself did not see anyone converted for seven years. He lived in penury, contracted malaria, his five-year-old son died of dysentery, his grief-stricken wife became mentally ill, his printing presses were destroyed by fire. Of such people it might well be said that the world was not worthy.

“And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: ‘The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.
“ ‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I am going to spew you out of my mouth. For you say, I am rich, I have become rich, and I need nothing, and do not know that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may become rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see. Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline; be zealous, therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him, and he with me.
‘The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’ ”

Christ is the Amen, the end of all prayer and the end of the book of Revelation. He is ‘a true and faithful witness against us if we do not act according to all his word’ (Jer 42:5). He is the beginning (same word as in John 1:1 and Mark 13:19) of all creation, a truth the Laodiceans particularly need to comprehend (Col 1:15-18, 2:1, 4:16). In sum, he is the Omega and the Alpha.

LaodiceaLaodicea was founded in the mid 3rd century BC by Antiochus II of Syria and named after his wife, Laodice. It got its wealth from banking and from black garments which it made from a prized black wool – hence the references to money and clothing. It also had a medical centre in which blindness was treated with an eye-salve. Water was supplied by an aqueduct. Warmed under the sun, the water was neither refreshingly cool, like that at Colossae, nor pleasantly hot, like the springs at nearby Hierapolis (Col 4:13).

Material wealth had deceived the Christians into thinking that they were also spiritually rich. That was not the case. Of treasure in heaven – and no other treasure will outlast our bodies – the Laodiceans had nothing. Forty years previously Paul had impressed on them the importance of receiving Christ (Col 2:6), but they no longer knew him. They needed to hear his voice, open their hearts and allow him in. Without him their works amounted to nothing. Without the garments of atonement that he provided, they could not be considered Christians at all.

The same complacency will be encountered later in the woman who symbolises civilisation at the end of the age. She is dressed in expensive cloths, beautified with eye-paint and adorned with gold and jewels. She says, “I sit like a queen; mourning I shall never see,” but before long she will find herself naked and desolate. The western Church resembles the world around her. The Church of England is a typical example: an institution wedded to the State (in contrast to the Catholic Church, which is itself a State), still hierarchical, still ritualistic (where it does not substitute formality for the banal), still concerned, when a choice must be made, to please man rather than God. As prophesied of society in the last days, it ‘has the form of piety, but denies the power of it’ (II Tim 3:5). The non-State churches also languish.

To assert that denial of one’s own blindness is evidence of that blindness may seem a circular argument. How can one argue against it? But it may still be true (John 9:40f). The Council of Laodicea, representing the churches of Asia in AD 364, accepted the canonicity of all the books in the New Testament except John’s book (if they knew of it). Today all the churches accept it, but reject most of what it teaches, just as they reject the faithful and true testimony of the prophets concerning the beginning of creation. That beginning is a person, not a ‘Big Bang’, just as the end is a person. The beginning and the end hang together (II Pet 3:4).

Those whom Christ loves (philω, expressing affection), he rebukes and disciplines. He disciplines us for our good, that we may share in his holiness (Heb 12:10). We should treasure such love.

The Church is intended to preserve society from its natural tendency to rot. Her role is to speak prophetic- ally about the judgement and salvation of God, to promote the good and oppose what is evil, to set an example of peace, kindness and obedience. If she loses her saltiness, she is no longer fit for anything but to be thrown out and trampled under men’s feet. She becomes like Jeremiah’s loincloth, herself rotting in the river of the nations (Jer 13:1-11), and God withholds destruction no longer. That is why faithless Laodicea is the last of the seven churches.